Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Coping with the new-developer flood
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ksummit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 10:32:40PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Most subsystems take patches against -next and backport the Fixes. > A couple have a tree for the -rc branch and want patches that apply > specifically to that. These are net, bpf and certain Intel networking > drivers. These three subsystems want people to put in the subject > which tree they are working against like [PATCH net-next]" I think it's at least as common if not more common to take fixes against Linus' tree or the tree's current fixes branch and then merge them up into the development code as needed. There are a few trees constantly cherry picking things around but it's a very small proportion of trees.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmp0+TgACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AePAf/V8zB01okQASKlpsGQg21sZ445J4k03QLuXo55uQvGAC+2FG7Gisd1g2c Kkh50MQJJ+Xi1nt6NxfQi94mNC5QogBw6DlSYVfddZBJQCiKq1A5aG5cLzxF860T XJS/xaf8hsqHkndwE8sf98/Q5X7NdkBqCIAysrGgG0HbvjOH6kF/NPjk6kM9go3n jjPa6vNC8BGiqVkHx4jvECeI72CETO+ZcWvqgQulIJ5SRZ+Yzxq1YnVYwhbQ2Vwa 6pmCPwZiW68pLjO2zYd45/wlpgQ0Ty27mHaAmWrzWS8y8imB1oLYGY6fe2qSdrrb PHYcaJDGH6hK55UuhmxTyJIpKDRkGQ== =3CU5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----