Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Time to call it quits for the maintainer summit?

Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.ksummit
Organization Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Finland
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 06:33:05AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> So I remember some of the problem, if you cherry-pick with -x the
>> complaint was we had commits in -fixes with a cherry-pick commit id
>> that wasn't in Linus' tree at that time.
>
>> It would of course later materialise in Linus' tree when the next
>> merge window occurred since we don't rebase, but this either broke
>> people's brains or scripts badly enough we got push back on it.
>
>> I think we should definitely do -x on all cherry-picks and I'll push
>> to make sure we start doing it again.
>
> That'd be helpful, thanks -  I guess you're going to annoy someone
> either way unfortunately but at least the commit not in mainline issue
> would be transient.

We use the drm subsystem maintainer tool for cherry-picks, and it uses
the -x option.

If you have any suggestions for helpful but non-intrusive additional
annotations on cherry-picked commits, it should be easy enough to update
the tool. And perhaps the annotation could be more widely adopted as
well. It's not like nobody else ever cherry-picks, we just do it
more. The annotation could still be the same.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.