Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Time to call it quits for the maintainer summit?

"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.ksummit
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/18/26 16:02, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 09:09:22AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>>
>> When succession is happening, it would be good to have the new person
>> shadow the outgoing person.
> 
> That's a good idea, where it's possible.  Have you suggested this to
> David and Andrew?  I know there are a lot of discussions about the
> succession within the mm subsystem, and since it's (from an outsider's
> perspective), it's a large and very healthy community, my personal
> preference would be to let the mm subsystem work through this
> succession, and then we can take learnings a year or so after the
> succession is complete.

I am not sure why we are suddenly discussing the MM transition here.

Liam, do you see a particular problem in the way we are currently tackling the
transition? Or was that just a general comment, independent of the MM thingy?

-- 
Cheers,

David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.