Re: [PATCH v9 14/16] KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement fixed-counters-only emulation

Fuad Tabba <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-hardening,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest
Message-ID <CA+EHjTx0zNQ_yPCz38vGYpBssshE4b3KWaoUxjzuerGgzB=JSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Akihiko,

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 at 06:39, Akihiko Odaki
<[email protected]> wrote:
...

> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_create_perf_event - create a perf event for a counter
> + * @pmc: Counter context
> + */
> +static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
> +       struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu = vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu;
> +
> +       if (kvm_pmu_fixed_counters_only(vcpu->kvm)) {
> +               do {
> +                       arm_pmu = kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu(READ_ONCE(vcpu->cpu));
> +
> +                       if (!arm_pmu) {
> +                               pr_warn_once("kvm: Unsupported PMU variation detected.\n");
> +                               add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> +                               return;
> +                       }

Sashiko flagged that this can leave the perf event out of sync with
the sysreg, which looks plausible: on a pCPU with no registered pPMU
this returns without recreating the event, so a guest event-type
change there updates the sysreg but not the event, and after migrating
back to a pCPU the original pPMU covers, kvm_pmc_enable_perf_event()
re-enables the stale event instead of recreating it.

I know you treat the no-pPMU case as out of spec, but the dropped
update lands once the vCPU is back on a normal pCPU. Is this intended?

Cheers,
/fuad
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.