Re: [PATCH v16 00/45] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM
Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:01:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:43:16 +0100, Steven Price <[email protected]> wrote: > > This series is based on the guest_memfd in-place conversion v9 tree[1], > which is itself based on kvm-x86/next. It is also available as a git > repository: Well done. Series on top of another random series, based on a random tree. Unusable. Have you realised there are reasons why we (KVM/arm64) ask people to base their series on a *released* tag from Linus' tree? This means that Sashiko cannot, once again, provide any feedback on this series, as it fails to apply. Just to avoid any ambiguity: Sashiko reviews, as annoying as they are, are not optional. They are very much mandatory, and I wish I could turn back the clocks to run it on my own code... Running it on your own is not enough, because *I* want to see what the tool finds. Not to mention that non-Gemini runs of sashiko are much less interesting (unsurprisingly). M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.