Re: [PATCH v6 00/33] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM

Steffen Eiden <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 09:36:26AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2026, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am 12.08.26 um 17:35 schrieb Steffen Eiden:
> > 
> > > C) KVM/s390 reorganization (patches 12-22):
> > >     Prepare s390 for a second KVM module. Move existing s390 KVM code into
> > >     dedicated s390 and gmap subdirectories to make room for a second KVM
> > >     implementation. Refactor gmap to better integrate with the second KVM
> > >     implementation. GMAP hides a few features only required when managing s390
> > >     guests: Storage keys, CMMA, and prefix handling. Those are guarded behind an
> > >     #if KVM_S390_MANAGES_S390_GUEST. Only features which implementation would
> > >     break kvm-arm64 code are guarded. I leave the non-breaking stuff (like
> > >     shadow-gmaps or ucontrol) for the LTO.
> > 
> > I will likely take 12-21 for the next merge window so that we can minimize this
> > patch set.  sashiko and claude are happy. Mostly mechanical moves. I will review
> > those first and might do small fixups myself if necessary.
> 
> Speaking of trimming down the patch set...
> 
> Steffen, can you post patch 1, "vfio: Use file-based reference counting for KVM",
> separately?  I'd love to get that merged sooner than later.

Sent a Spin-off with some improvements:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

	Steffen
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.