Re: [PATCH v6 08/33] KVM: arm64: Use accessor functions for core regs
Steffen Eiden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 10:56:37AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 16:36:04 +0100, > Steffen Eiden <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Instead of accessing the value directly use assessor function that > > s/assessor function/accessors/ > > > abstract the actual location of the register values. Add a helper > > function to reset fpsimd registers. Enable other KVM implementations to > > reuse this code. > > to reuse this code by overloading the accessors. > Will change ... > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c > > index b01d6622b872..773f6c8e5026 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c > > @@ -134,19 +134,19 @@ static void *core_reg_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) > > KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]): > > off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.mregs[0]); > > off /= 2; > > - return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[off]; > > + return &vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[off]; > > Doesn't this belong to the previous patch? > My thoughts about positioning this change in this patch: The previous patch changes the semantics of vcpu_gp_regs and just touched the part where the old semantic of the function was used. This is mainly done by not using vcpu_gp_regs where it was used before as it cannot be used to access e.g. pstate anymore. This patch then introduces and *uses* new accessor functions for abstractions (and uses the vcpu_gp_regs abstraction where it was not used before). -> The patch changes direct accesses to using accessor functions. However, I have no strong feelings for this. If you want this in the previous patch, I can do that. Steffen