Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing race condition in ITS MMIO handler allows MSI injection while ITS is disabled due to a stale translation cache entry.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Free the caches when GITS_BASER changes ---
commit 98c89973da07ed23e9bd8348bfd2cf61333c4e66
Author: Fuad Tabba <[email protected]>
KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Free the caches when GITS_BASER changes
A guest that disables the ITS and changes GITS_BASER<n> with VALID still set
keeps the mapped devices and collections. This patch frees the list and
drops the translation cache whenever the stored value changes.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 9e782a4fea7e5..ab89b0138efd0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1702,6 +1705,8 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
> vgic_its_free_collection_list(kvm, its);
> break;
> }
> + /* A concurrent injection may have cached a translation. */
> + vgic_its_invalidate_cache(its);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the commit message explicitly notes that
an injection can still cache an entry after the ITS is disabled.
Is it possible for a subsequent MSI to trigger an unexpected LPI injection?
If Thread 1 (e.g. irqfd) calls vgic_its_inject_msi(), takes its_lock, and
enters vgic_its_resolve_lpi() in arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c, it reads
its->enabled as true.
If Thread 2 (guest vCPU) concurrently disables the ITS via
vgic_mmio_write_its_ctlr(), it acquires cmd_lock (but not its_lock), sets
its->enabled to false, and clears the cache.
Thread 1 could then resume, finish resolving the LPI, and call
vgic_its_cache_translation() to insert the entry into the cache, ignoring the
fact that its->enabled is now false.
A subsequent MSI would then hit vgic_its_inject_cached_translation(), which
does a fast-path lookup without checking its->enabled, successfully injecting
the MSI.
Could this violate the GICv3 specification by delivering LPIs while the ITS
is explicitly disabled, potentially crashing a guest OS during kexec?
> mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
> }
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.