Re: Landstrip

On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 03:19:09PM -0400, Justin Suess wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 04:42:51AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > I played with an idea could Landlock LSM be used to do conceptually a
> > better fit sandbox for programs such as Anthropic Sandbox Runtime [1].
> > 
> > After some missteps at first I got it pulled together quite well:
> > 
> > https://crates.io/crates/landstrip
> > 
> > To see it in action I also have a fork of pi-hashline-readmap plugin,
> > which was a cherry-picked test case I wanted to try out given it already
> > hooks the bash tool command for compressed output.
> > 
> > I just thought that this might interest some as Landlock is not really
> > over-used kernel feature in "application sense".
> > 
> > This is a more lower barrier and more failure tolerant to deploy than
> > Bubblewrap based container for this use and purpose in my opinion
> > at least.
> > 
> Very cool! Landlock is great for this usecase of application driven
> sandboxing.
> 
> (just a quick note, the linux-security-module/linux-integrity
> mailing lists mostly for kernel development patches, the
> landlock.lists.linux.dev list is more for
> userspace Landlock topics like this. so I removed the cc for
> linux-security-module/linux-integrity and added that list)
> 
> I notice there is a seccomp policy for unix sockets in this application.
> Although it might not be in your kernel yet, support for sandboxing
> named unix sockets with Landlock was recently merged. :)
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/[email protected]/

Thanks for the pointer. My focus has been more in the wiring than inner
shenanigans but soon might be a good time to revisit :-)

I have also Seatbelt FFI and Windows AppContainer profiles are whatever
they call them through Win32 API.

BR, Jarkko