Re: [BUG] Landlock denies LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE despite a correctly-anchored PathBeneath rule (contradicts selftest layout1.execute)

Hello Ken!

(Also adding [email protected] to CC)

On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 09:07:56PM +0000, Ken Grimes wrote:
> Hey all, this is my first bug report for linux. The issue was discovered 
> alongside llm-assisted coding on a downstream project. The 
> investigation/testing of the bug was a mostly manual process so I could 
> be sure this was something real. Please let me know if I can provide any
> further details or assistance. Hope this is helpful, thank you for all of your
> hard work!

Welcome and thanks for reporting your first issue!

I believe the issue you are observing is that the /bin/true program you are
starting is a dynamically linked executable.  As such, executing it requires
both the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE right on the binary itself and on
the system's dynamic loader binary, which usually lives in /lib/ld-linux.so.*
(but there are symlinks and 32/64-bit differences at play as well, which
influence the actual final location).

You can try this out with the following experiments:

(1) Compile a "true" program statically and try using that:

    $ echo 'int main() { return 0; }' > true.c
    $ CFLAGS=-static make true

    This can be started with the test you have,
    unlike the dynamically linked version.

(2) Alternatively, add execute permissions for the dynamic loader:

    Add an additional "path beneath" rule that allow-lists the execution
    access right on /lib/ld-linux.so.2, /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 or
    wherever else your dynamic loader is.  (You can discover the actual
    location using "ldd /bin/true".)

With either one of these two changes, your standalone reproducer program
starts working again.  Or at least it does on my machine.  If it still doesn't
work on your end that way, please let us know. :)

I admit that we should probably point this out in the Landlock documentation
for the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE right, as dynamic linking is common and it
is a potential issue that many people might run into.

For background on the dynamic loading mechanism, see the man page ld.so(8) [1]
and the LWN article "How programs get run: ELF binaries" [2] (specifically the
section "Dynamically linked programs").

—Günther


[1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ld.so.8.html
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/631631/