Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths

On 14.07.2026 11:52, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 13.07.2026 21:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 03:03:48PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> I'm fine with merging on top of the topic branch and I assume that this
>>>> patchset is mature enough to give it a try in linux-next, but first I
>>>> would like to get a review or at least acks from others with good CC
>>>> knowledge or experience.
>>> I think it is good to go from a CC perspective, there are still some
>>> more items to fix up (like the MMIO) but I'd rather they be followups
>>> at this point.
>> Great. Aneesh, any chance You could send v8 with the remaining items
>> fixed till end of this week? I will be happy to push it to
>> dma-mapping-for-next for testing in linux-next asap.
>>
> Sure. You need this rebased on top of the pKVM changes, right?
> Otherwise, we'll end up with conflicts when you do the final pull
> request.
Ah, indeed. I forgot about the pKVM changes. If there is a stable
branch with those patches, please base v8 on top of it.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland