Re: [PATCH v15 00/37] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM

Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:20:49 +0100,
Steven Price <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 16/07/2026 09:36, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:28:02 +0100,
> > Steven Price <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series adds support for running protected VMs using KVM under the
> >> Arm Confidential Compute Architecture (CCA).
> >>
> >> It is the second part of the Arm CCA host support that was previously
> >> posted as a single 44-patch series. The generic firmware/RMM support has
> >> now been split into a separate 6-patch base series[0] so that it can also be
> >> used by other work (and hopefully make reviewing a little easier). This
> >> series applies on top of that base.
> > 
> > Splitting the series this way means that no Sashiko review can occur,
> > as nothing applies on its own:
> > 
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715142841.80544-1-steven.price%40arm.com
> > 
> > In the future, please post this with the relevant patches as an
> > integral prefix, so that we can make use of the tooling.
> 
> Ah, I wonder if there's a way to teach Sashiko to deal with dependencies
> like this? Anyway if you're happy with everything in one series and
> (hopefully) merging a prefix earlier then I'll go back to that - it's
> easier for me too.

Sashiko had plenty to say about the first series, and you've been Cc'd
on the reports. I'd expect responses to the reports explaining why
this isn't a problem, or how you are planning to address it.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.