Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Add RMPOPT support.

"Kalra, Ashish" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Boris,

On 7/20/2026 3:28 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 03:17:23PM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
>> Just a gentle ping on this series. I believe v10 addresses the feedback from the earlier rounds. 
>> Please let me know if it looks good to merge, or if there's anything else you'd like me to change.
> 
> What about those Sashiko comments to it:
> 
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1782841284.git.ashish.kalra%40amd.com
> 
> ?
> 

The three Sashiko comments on v10 all resolved to no code change, with rationale posted inline:

  1. Suspend/resume vs. hotplug disable (patch 3): pre-existing base-SNP behavior — an SNP host doesn't support suspend/resume anyway (SnpEn is set once before
     SNP_INIT and can't be rebuilt on resume), so it can't arise.
  2. snp_setup_rmpopt() re-init pass (patch 4): performance-only and self-correcting, doesn't occur on RMPOPT-capable platforms (the x86_snp_shutdown path frees
     the workqueue, so re-init re-runs the pass) — the guarded case is legacy-firmware-only.
  3. mod_delayed_work() and VM churn (patch 6): deliberate — queue_delayed_work() would regress the common case (scanning a guest before its page conversion 
     completes), the deferral is best-effort and self-limiting.

Thanks,
Ashish
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.