Re: [PATCH v16 00/45] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM

Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:01:07 +0100
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:43:16 +0100,
Steven Price <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This series is based on the guest_memfd in-place conversion v9 tree[1],
> which is itself based on kvm-x86/next. It is also available as a git
> repository:

Well done. Series on top of another random series, based on a random
tree. Unusable. Have you realised there are reasons why we (KVM/arm64)
ask people to base their series on a *released* tag from Linus' tree?
This means that Sashiko cannot, once again, provide any feedback on
this series, as it fails to apply.

Just to avoid any ambiguity: Sashiko reviews, as annoying as they are,
are not optional. They are very much mandatory, and I wish I could
turn back the clocks to run it on my own code...

Running it on your own is not enough, because *I* want to see what the
tool finds. Not to mention that non-Gemini runs of sashiko are much
less interesting (unsurprisingly).

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.