Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus

Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
>> Changes from v8:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
>> * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch.
>
> Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply
> series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3)
> and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other
> maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel
> (typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different
> branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what
> for-next/core is, as the name implies).
>

The reason is that these two patches create conflicts. Since this series
involves file movement, resolving those conflicts was not
straightforward. Therefore, I rebased the series on top of both of the
following commits:

commit 24f55f511b9e ("virt: arm-cca-guest: use migrate_disable() for attestation token requests")
commit e62decaf98e7 ("arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform")

-aneesh
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.