Re: [PATCH v10 16/41] KVM: guest_memfd: Zero page while getting pfn

>> Previously, without in-place conversion, populate never reads memory
>> from guest_memfd so there was no danger of leaking uninitialized memory.
>>>
>>> In case post-populate failed, do we want to re-zero the pages?
>>
>> I believe we can't re-zero the pages. When SNP fails to populate it
>> could be because SNP didn't like the CPUIDs userspace set up, and after
>> the error userspace is expected to check what SNP likes, then
>> retry.

Ah, okay.

>>
>> IIUC zeroing will destroy the message SNP wanted to leave for userspace.
>>
>> Michael should be able to explain more here :)
> 
> Not Michael, but the above is correct.  If firmware rejects a CPUID page, then
> KVM copies back the expected CPUID values provided by firmware.
> 
> That said, now that we have have @may_writeback_src we _could_ re-zero the page,
> i.e. only zero pages for which @may_writeback_src is %false.
> 
> And _that_ said, I vote "no".  KVM zeros the memory mostly to ensure userspace
> can't read stale data, e.g. someone else's data.  I don't think we need to
> guarantee that a failed populate() (or rather, whatever ioctl called into it)
> will leave memory in any particular state.  It would be easier to document that
> the page contents may be modified on failure.

Let's do that then!

-- 
Cheers,

David