Re: [PATCH v10 12/41] KVM: guest_memfd: Call arch make_shared callback for to-shared conversion

Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>> Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026, Binbin Wu wrote:
>> >> On 8/8/2026 5:52 AM, Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay wrote:
>> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT
>> >> > +static void kvm_gmem_make_shared(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +	struct folio_batch fbatch;
>> >> > +	pgoff_t next = start;
>> >> > +	int i;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +	folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
>> >> > +	while (filemap_get_folios(inode->i_mapping, &next, end - 1, &fbatch)) {
>> >> > +		for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); ++i) {
>> >> > +			struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
>> >> > +			pgoff_t start_index, end_index;
>> >> > +			kvm_pfn_t start_pfn;
>> >> > +			kvm_pfn_t nr_pages;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +			start_index = max(start, folio->index);
>> >> > +			end_index = min(end, folio_next_index(folio));
>> >> > +			/*
>> >> > +			 * end_index is either in folio or points to
>> >> > +			 * the first page of the next folio. Hence,
>> >> > +			 * all pages in range [start_index, end_index)
>> >> > +			 * are contiguous.
>> >> > +			 */
>> >> > +			start_pfn = folio_file_pfn(folio, start_index);
>> >> > +			nr_pages = end_index - start_index;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +			kvm_arch_gmem_make_shared(start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> >> > +		}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +		folio_batch_release(&fbatch);
>> >> > +		cond_resched();
>> >> > +	}
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +#else
>> >> > +static void kvm_gmem_make_shared(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end) {}
>> >> > +#endif
>> >> > +
>> >> >  static int __kvm_gmem_set_attributes(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t start,
>> >> >  				     size_t nr_pages, uint64_t attrs,
>> >> >  				     pgoff_t *err_index)
>> >> > @@ -599,7 +636,12 @@ static int __kvm_gmem_set_attributes(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t start,
>> >> >
>> >> >  	filter = to_private ? KVM_FILTER_SHARED : KVM_FILTER_PRIVATE;
>> >> >  	kvm_gmem_invalidate_start(inode, start, end, filter);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +	if (!to_private)
>>
>> Should I make this condition
>>
>> 	if (!to_private && kvm_x86_ops.gmem_make_shared)
>>
>> instead?
>>
>> Will that help?
>
> No, because that's bleeding x86 details into common code, which defeats the purpose
> of arch hooks.

Ah okay yup maybe it should have been kvm_arch_has_gmem_make_shared()
that defaults to false and x86 will return !!kvm_x86_ops.gmem_make_shared.

> That's why I think it's worth analyzing the cost: if it's in the
> noise, leave it alone.  If it's meaningful, figure out a not-too-gross way to skip
> the entire thing if kvm_arch_gmem_make_shared() is a glorified nop in the end.

Is noise defined relative to the entire conversion process? Would this
benchmark look like

1. Convert 4G to shared on TDX with CONFIG_AMD_SEV defined
2. Convert 4G to shared on TDX without CONFIG_AMD_SEV defined

and then compare the difference in time taken?