Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: TDX: Enable VM-DoS Prevention Features for TDX

On Wed, 2026-08-19 at 16:03 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > To me this is not a valid reason. Sashiko is great, but we can't let false
> > positives drive the patches. Given that the series is so big now, I'd think
> > it would be better to leave 6 and 9 for follow up, so we can focus on the
> > core thing.
> 
> Hmm, I disagree.  If the consolidation weren't here, I'd absolutely ask for
> it. This is new feature enabling.  Yeah, it happens to be tagged for stable,
> but at the end of the day, it's new feature enabling.  And it's standard
> operation procedure to do cleanups and dedup code as part of new feature
> enabling.
> 
> If anything patch 6 should be patch 1, but that's a minor detail I can sort
> out when applying (assuming another version isn't required).

Ok. But you disagree with dropping the patch? Or that avoiding sashiko reports
of existing issues is an invalid reason to change the series?

I think it's good to discuss a bit how to handle sashiko scenarios.