Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use seq_buf for string concatenation

> Op 20-06-2026 19:54 CEST schreef Woradorn Laodhanadhaworn <[email protected]>:
> 
>  
> In preparation for removing the strlcat API[1],
> replace the string concatenation logic with a struct seq_buf,
> which tracks the current position and the remaining space internally.
> 
> The backing buffer bootup_event_buf allocation is unchanged.
> Use seq_buf_str() to NUL-terminate before passing to early_enable_events().
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/370 [1]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Woradorn Laodhanadhaworn <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index c46e623e7e0d..15164723e028 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sort.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_buf.h>
>  
>  #include <trace/events/sched.h>
>  #include <trace/syscall.h>
> @@ -4501,13 +4502,23 @@ extern struct trace_event_call *__start_ftrace_events[];
>  extern struct trace_event_call *__stop_ftrace_events[];
>  
>  static char bootup_event_buf[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE] __initdata;

Isn't this now unused?

> +static struct seq_buf bootup_event_seq;
> +static bool bootup_event_seq_initialized;
>  

I think this can be refactored to avoid the bool. And should bootup_event_seq not be
__initdata?

>  static __init int setup_trace_event(char *str)
>  {
> -	if (bootup_event_buf[0] != '\0')
> -		strlcat(bootup_event_buf, ",", COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
> +	if (!bootup_event_seq_initialized) {
> +		seq_buf_init(&bootup_event_seq, bootup_event_buf, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
> +		bootup_event_seq_initialized = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (seq_buf_used(&bootup_event_seq) > 0)
> +		seq_buf_puts(&bootup_event_seq, ",");
>  
> -	strlcat(bootup_event_buf, str, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
> +	seq_buf_puts(&bootup_event_seq, str);
> +
> +	if (seq_buf_has_overflowed(&bootup_event_seq))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	trace_set_ring_buffer_expanded(NULL);
>  	disable_tracing_selftest("running event tracing");
> @@ -4766,7 +4777,7 @@ static __init int event_trace_enable(void)
>  	 */
>  	__trace_early_add_events(tr);
>  
> -	early_enable_events(tr, bootup_event_buf, false);
> +	early_enable_events(tr, (char *)seq_buf_str(&bootup_event_seq), false);

What if trace_event is empty? Then setup_trace_event does not run AFAIK. See the
WARN_ON in seq_buf_str too. Have you tested this?

>  
>  	trace_printk_start_comm();
>  
> @@ -4794,7 +4805,7 @@ static __init int event_trace_enable_again(void)
>  	if (!tr)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	early_enable_events(tr, bootup_event_buf, true);
> +	early_enable_events(tr, (char *)seq_buf_str(&bootup_event_seq), true);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.43.0

Thanks,
Jori.