[PATCH v2] rust_binder: use pin_init::zeroed for file_operations initialization

All types in `bindings` implement `Zeroable` if they can. This enables
using `pin_init::zeroed()` for `file_operations` initialization instead
of relying on `unsafe { core::mem::MaybeUninit::zeroed().assume_init() }`.

This change improves readability and removes an unnecessary unsafe
block.

Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1189
Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolás Antinori <[email protected]>
---
Changelog:

v2: Removed zeroed_ops variable and moved pin_init::zeroed() inside the
struct initialization. This is just a code style change suggested in
the previous patch.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/T/#u

 drivers/android/binder/rust_binder_main.rs | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder/rust_binder_main.rs b/drivers/android/binder/rust_binder_main.rs
index dc1941cd2407..cc9b10e41807 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder/rust_binder_main.rs
+++ b/drivers/android/binder/rust_binder_main.rs
@@ -314,9 +314,6 @@ unsafe impl<T> Sync for AssertSync<T> {}
 #[no_mangle]
 #[used]
 pub static rust_binder_fops: AssertSync<kernel::bindings::file_operations> = {
-    // SAFETY: All zeroes is safe for the `file_operations` type.
-    let zeroed_ops = unsafe { core::mem::MaybeUninit::zeroed().assume_init() };
-
     let ops = kernel::bindings::file_operations {
         owner: THIS_MODULE.as_ptr(),
         poll: Some(rust_binder_poll),
@@ -326,7 +323,7 @@ unsafe impl<T> Sync for AssertSync<T> {}
         open: Some(rust_binder_open),
         release: Some(rust_binder_release),
         flush: Some(rust_binder_flush),
-        ..zeroed_ops
+        ..pin_init::zeroed()
     };
     AssertSync(ops)
 };
--
2.47.3