Re: [PATCH] iio: humidity: hts221: Fix checkpatch blank line warning
Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Aug 2026 18:12:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.linux-kernel-mentees,org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260802181233.535eeb12@jic23-huawei> |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 17:38:52 +0200 Joshua Crofts <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 10:06:13 +0800 > Adi Nata <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Checkpatch warning: > > > > WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations > > + struct hts221_hw *hw = iio_priv(iio_dev); > > > > Signed-off-by: Adi Nata <[email protected]> > > --- > > This seems like churn on its own, Jonathan may not apply it. > True. This highlights a broader point. When making a number of cleanups to a driver (and I am generally more willing to take those than many maintainers) please group them into a little patch series with a cover letter. If this is one of a set and overall the seem worthwhile I might pick them up. Plus this driver is pretty aged so there are other quality of code / modernization things that will make much more of an impact than just this blank line. Take a look at some of the other similar cleanup series on the IIO list and see what makes sense here. To give you a starter, dev_err_probe() and checking which prints are actually useful + stopping the driver rejecting Device tree falllback compatibles because of the hard fail on a device ID mismatch. > > Also, I feel like just putting checkpatch warnings directly into the > commit message is bad practice. Much better if it were "Add a blank line > after variable declarations per checkpatch warning." Fully agree with this. We really don't care what the print is, just what is being improved and why. Thanks Jonathan