Re: [PATCH v3] iio: health: max30102: fix NULL dereference in interrupt handler

Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-kernel-mentees,org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CAHp75VdL+NarOfkY7mOB1U3Aud-TMjM8MPEsCapjYCoL0ikpbg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:06 AM Marco Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The interrupt is requested in max30102_probe() and stays enabled
> for the lifetime of the device, but indio_dev->active_scan_mask is only
> valid while a buffer is enabled. When an interrupt arrives while no
> buffer is enabled, the handler dereferences the NULL active_scan_mask:
>
>   Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 0000000000000000

>   pc : __bitmap_weight+0x64/0x98
>   lr : max30102_interrupt_handler+0x48/0x160 [max30102]

For these two lines see the below comment

>   Call trace:
>    __bitmap_weight+0x64/0x98 (P)
>    max30102_interrupt_handler+0x48/0x160 [max30102]

>    irq_thread_fn+0x28/0xa8
>    irq_thread+0x184/0x30c
>    kthread+0x118/0x124
>    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

As Submitting Patches documentation recommends these lines are not
significant in a traceback example and may be dropped. So altogether
drop 6 unneeded lines.

> Call max30102_fifo_count() at the top of the handler and return early
> unless it reports a FIFO sample is ready. Because FIFO_RDY is the only
> interrupt source enabled in max30102_chip_init(), an invocation of
> max30102_interrupt_handler() without the FIFO_RDY interrupt status bit
> set carries no data to read and can return before touching
> active_scan_mask. A negative return from max30102_fifo_count()
> indicates a failed interrupt status read and is treated the same way.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.