Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83

David Teigland <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-lvm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 08:47:22PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > commit 6c22392a3f903d6c086f7cc94978bdf8b072da6e
> > > Author: David Teigland <[email protected]>
> > > Date:   Tue Mar 16 09:52:13 2021 -0500
> > > 
> > >      config: change default use_devicesfile to 1
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/lib/config/defaults.h b/lib/config/defaults.h
> > > index 66eece53aa33..a7a2a06df654 100644
> > > --- a/lib/config/defaults.h
> > > +++ b/lib/config/defaults.h
> > > @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@
> > >   #define DEFAULT_MD_COMPONENT_CHECKS "auto"
> > > -#define DEFAULT_USE_DEVICES_FILE 0
> > > +#define DEFAULT_USE_DEVICES_FILE 1
> > >   #define DEFAULT_DEVICES_FILE "system.devices"
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Later commits that removed DEFAULT_USE_DEVICES_FILE, and tried to replace
> > > it with a configure option, was a failed attempt at building that lvm
> > > source for RHEL8.  It's caused no end of problems and I plan to revert it
> > > and restore define DEFAULT_USE_DEVICES_FILE 1.
> > 
> > 
> > There is no problem with configuring DEFAULT_USE_DEVICES_FILE with
> > 'configure --with-default-use-devices-file= 0/1' and thus no need to change
> > anything here.
> > 
> > Current upstream has set this default value as 0  (in configure.ac)
> > 
> > RHEL builds use this setting as 1.  (Possibly even Fedora nowadays).
> > 
> > The major problem with turning this  to 1 is the distribution must be
> > 'ready' with such relatively invasive change as it changes also requirements
> > on how the boot image is created  (devicesfile must be copied to ramdisk).
> > 
> > So Suse  may try to set this setting  to 1  and see what all breaks.
> > 
> > 
> > Zdenek
> 
> Does this mean that distributions *should* set this to 1 and update
> their installers?

Yes, the devices file is intended to be a default feature of lvm since the
commit above.

> This would have saved Qubes OS a security bulletin (LVM was scanning
> VM-controlled block devices) and might make LVM faster (since it would
> no longer need to scan every device on the system).

These are both advantages of using it.

Dave
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.