Re: pvmove thin volume doesn't move

On Wed, 2025-11-19 at 09:07 -0500, Matthew Patton wrote:
>=20
> That is one hell of a wild and unsupported assumption.

Yeah, I too was going to challenge that statement that I was a "lonely"
outlier in the community of LVM users that would want to be able to
move a thinly-provisioned LV from one PV to another, just as non-
thinly-provisioned LVs can be.

> Practically nobody , even seasoned sysadmins would know of this
> deficiency.

Indeed, I was skeptical that this was commonly understood as well.=20
Well by anyone who had not tried it as I did only to find it is not
supported.

It does suck to have to choose between feature sets that are both very
useful.

Cheers,
b.