Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] cgroup/cpuset: update some comments about the page allocator

Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/15/26 7:03 AM, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> These comments describing the page allocator are out of date:
>
> - __alloc_pages() is no longer a public API and has no business being
>    described outside of mm/.
>
> - The `wait` variable is gone.
>
> It may be out of date for other reasons too but this patch is just
> fixing the issues that stood out.
>
> To fix it:
>
> - Instead of referring to a specific function, instead to "the page
>    allocator"
>
> - Completely drop out-of-date details of that function's internal
>    behaviour, since they were irrelevant anyway.
>
> Suggested-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <[email protected]>
> ---
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 13 +++++--------
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 24ea2d09cdbdb..dfd0f827e3b92 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -4193,7 +4193,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
>    * nearest enclosing hardwalled ancestor cpuset.
>    *
>    * Scanning up parent cpusets requires callback_lock.  The
> - * __alloc_pages() routine only calls here with __GFP_HARDWALL bit
> + * page allocator only calls here with __GFP_HARDWALL bit
>    * _not_ set if it's a GFP_KERNEL allocation, and all nodes in the
>    * current tasks mems_allowed came up empty on the first pass over
>    * the zonelist.  So only GFP_KERNEL allocations, if all nodes in the
> @@ -4206,11 +4206,8 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
>    * come before the __GFP_HARDWALL check, otherwise a dying task
>    * would be blocked on the fast path.
>    *
> - * The second pass through get_page_from_freelist() doesn't even call
> - * here for GFP_ATOMIC calls.  For those calls, the __alloc_pages()
> - * variable 'wait' is not set, and the bit ALLOC_CPUSET is not set
> - * in alloc_flags.  That logic and the checks below have the combined
> - * affect that:
> + * The second pass through get_page_from_freelist() doesn't even call here for
> + * GFP_ATOMIC calls.  That, and the checks below have the combined affect that:
>    *	in_interrupt - any node ok (current task context irrelevant)
>    *	GFP_ATOMIC   - any node ok
>    *	tsk_is_oom_victim   - any node ok
> @@ -4327,8 +4324,8 @@ void cpuset_nodes_allowed(struct cgroup *cgroup, nodemask_t *mask)
>    * should not be possible for the following code to return an
>    * offline node.  But if it did, that would be ok, as this routine
>    * is not returning the node where the allocation must be, only
> - * the node where the search should start.  The zonelist passed to
> - * __alloc_pages() will include all nodes.  If the slab allocator
> + * the node where the search should start.  The zonelist used by
> + * the allocator will include all nodes.  If the slab allocator
>    * is passed an offline node, it will fall back to the local node.
>    * See kmem_cache_alloc_node().
>    */
Acked-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.