Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] af_unix: Clean up unix_schedule_gc()

[email protected]
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditional garbage collector scheduling in `do_exit()` causes severe lock contention and system-wide DoS when a live AF_UNIX cycle exists.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] af_unix: Clean up unix_schedule_gc() ---
commit 649d449e71c2d27619a029df46ed559c6fa2ae0c
Author: Nam Cao <[email protected]>

af_unix: Clean up unix_schedule_gc()

This patch simplifies unix_schedule_gc() by removing its parameter,
as it was only called with NULL. The user struct parameter and the
logic depending on it are removed.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index b507b2a24693a..f3bee7cc637d0 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
>  	exit_sem(tsk);
>  	exit_shm(tsk);
>  	exit_files(tsk);
> -	unix_schedule_gc(NULL); /* Must be after exit_files() */
> +	unix_schedule_gc(); /* Must be after exit_files() */

[Severity: High]
Does this call trigger the garbage collector for every exiting task in the
system?

If an unprivileged user creates a live AF_UNIX cyclic reference and leaves
them open, while queueing a large number of normal inflight sockets up to
RLIMIT_NOFILE, the live cycle causes unix_graph_state to persistently be
UNIX_GRAPH_CYCLIC.

Every task exit would then constantly queue unix_gc_work, which executes
unix_walk_scc_fast() under the unix_gc_lock spinlock, iterating over all
inflight sockets:

net/unix/garbage.c:unix_walk_scc_fast() {
    ...
    while (!list_empty(&unix_unvisited_vertices)) {
    ...
}

Could this O(N) loop iterating over all inflight sockets while holding the
unix_gc_lock cause severe lock contention and a system-wide performance
degradation for any AF_UNIX operations like sendmsg and recvmsg that block
on this lock?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=3
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.