Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] af_unix: Clean up unix_schedule_gc()

Nam Cao <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] writes:
> [Severity: High]
> Does this call trigger the garbage collector for every exiting task in the
> system?
>
> If an unprivileged user creates a live AF_UNIX cyclic reference and leaves
> them open, while queueing a large number of normal inflight sockets up to
> RLIMIT_NOFILE, the live cycle causes unix_graph_state to persistently be
> UNIX_GRAPH_CYCLIC.
>
> Every task exit would then constantly queue unix_gc_work, which executes
> unix_walk_scc_fast() under the unix_gc_lock spinlock, iterating over all
> inflight sockets:
>
> net/unix/garbage.c:unix_walk_scc_fast() {
>     ...
>     while (!list_empty(&unix_unvisited_vertices)) {
>     ...
> }
>
> Could this O(N) loop iterating over all inflight sockets while holding the
> unix_gc_lock cause severe lock contention and a system-wide performance
> degradation for any AF_UNIX operations like sendmsg and recvmsg that block
> on this lock?

Yes. But this is also a pre-existing issue. An unprivileged user can
already create a huge live circle, and then repeatedly create and close
a AF_UNIX socket which constantly schedules the garbage collector.

Perhaps we should think about a GC scheduling policy. Perhaps like other
garbage collector designs which get scheduled when memory runs low, or
maybe periodic? I can put this on my todo list.

Nam
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.