Re: [PATCH v4] docs: real-time: mention the hrtimer sleeper HARD path

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-08-15 00:12:40 [+0800], Liang Hao wrote:
> The Timers section of Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst
> describes the PREEMPT_RT default (softirq / ktimers) and HRTIMER_MODE_HARD,
> but not the sleeper helper: hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack() marks the
> timer HRTIMER_MODE_HARD when the current task is RT or DEADLINE and
> HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT was not requested, so the wakeup runs in hard interrupt
> context.
> 
> Document that behaviour. Also rename "ktimersd" to "ktimers/%u" to match
> the per-CPU thread name.
> 
> No code or behaviour change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Hao <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3 -> v4:
> - drop the Documentation/timers/hrtimers.rst section; extend differences.rst
>   instead, per review
> - add only the sleeper HARD wording and the ktimers/%u rename
> - do not restate lowest-priority / cancel-PI points already covered elsewhere
> - avoid vague "and similar" caller lists
> 
>  Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst b/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst
> index a129570dab5a..c8acfba051eb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst
> @@ -119,12 +119,17 @@ timers initialized with the HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT flag, which are executed in
>  softirq context.
>  
>  On a PREEMPT_RT kernel, this behavior is reversed: hrtimers are executed in
> -softirq context by default, typically within the ktimersd thread. This thread
> -runs at the lowest real-time priority, ensuring it executes before any
> -SCHED_OTHER tasks but does not interfere with higher-priority real-time
> +softirq context by default, typically within the per-CPU ktimers/%u thread.

Please do ktimers instead ktimers/%u. I don't see any other reference to
a per-CPU thread like that. This would also be in sync with ksoftirqd.

> +This thread runs at the lowest real-time priority, ensuring it executes before
> +any SCHED_OTHER tasks but does not interfere with higher-priority real-time
>  threads. To explicitly request execution in hard interrupt context on
>  PREEMPT_RT, the timer must be marked with the HRTIMER_MODE_HARD flag.
>  
> +hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack() marks the sleeper HRTIMER_MODE_HARD when the
> +current task is in a real-time or deadline scheduling class and
> +HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT was not requested, so the wakeup runs in hard interrupt
> +context rather than on ktimers/%u.
> +

What about

   Userland sleeper deploy usually a hrtimer to guarantee a precise wakeup
   time. The timer is initialized with hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack()
   which distinguishes between real-time and regular tasks. The hrtimer of a
   task without a real-time priority is initialized with HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT
   but for real-time priorities HRTIMER_MODE_HARD is used. This ensures
   that real-time tasks are woken up as soon as possible while ordinary
   tasks can not block the CPU with a thundering herd of wake ups.

>  Memory allocation
>  -----------------
>  

Sebastian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.