[PATCH bpf-next v5 1/4] bpf: Add a sleepable page allocator for map memory

Jiayuan Chen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest
Message-ID <[email protected]>
bpf_map_alloc_pages() picks the allocator via can_alloc_pages(), a
conservative guess for BPF program context that is always false under
PREEMPT_RT. So even a caller that really is sleepable gets the
non-blocking allocator, which never reclaims and never engages the OOM
machinery.

Add bpf_map_alloc_page_sleepable() for callers that know they are
sleepable. Like the other bpf map allocators it places the page on the
map's numa_node and does not follow the faulting task's NUMA mempolicy;
arena memory is shared, so the map's node is the right placement policy.
The next patch uses it from the arena page fault handler.

Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <[email protected]>
---
To sashiko:
- The alloc_pages_nolock() fallback still zeroes: it forces __GFP_ZERO
  internally and only accepts __GFP_ACCOUNT.
- __GFP_ZERO is unchanged from the existing __bpf_alloc_page(), and no
  arena-capable arch has D-cache aliasing, so there is no dcache concern.
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index ffa5626411ac..18e84ec4692d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2784,6 +2784,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get_curr_or_next(u32 *id);
 
 int bpf_map_alloc_pages(const struct bpf_map *map, int nid,
 			unsigned long nr_pages, struct page **page_array);
+struct page *bpf_map_alloc_page_sleepable(const struct bpf_map *map);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 void bpf_map_memcg_enter(const struct bpf_map *map, struct mem_cgroup **old_memcg,
 			 struct mem_cgroup **new_memcg);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 6874ba1424af..f9b81638e537 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -602,15 +602,14 @@ static bool can_alloc_pages(void)
 		!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT);
 }
 
+#define BPF_PAGE_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOWARN)
+
 static struct page *__bpf_alloc_page(int nid)
 {
 	if (!can_alloc_pages())
 		return alloc_pages_nolock(__GFP_ACCOUNT, nid, 0);
 
-	return alloc_pages_node(nid,
-				GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_ACCOUNT
-				| __GFP_NOWARN,
-				0);
+	return alloc_pages_node(nid, BPF_PAGE_GFP, 0);
 }
 
 int bpf_map_alloc_pages(const struct bpf_map *map, int nid,
@@ -636,6 +635,20 @@ int bpf_map_alloc_pages(const struct bpf_map *map, int nid,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * For callers that know they run in a sleepable context, e.g. a user page
+ * fault handler. can_alloc_pages() is a conservative guess made for BPF
+ * program context - notably it is always false on PREEMPT_RT - so going
+ * through bpf_map_alloc_pages() there would needlessly pick the
+ * non-blocking allocator, which never reclaims and never engages the OOM
+ * machinery.
+ */
+struct page *bpf_map_alloc_page_sleepable(const struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+	might_sleep();
+	return alloc_pages_node(map->numa_node, BPF_PAGE_GFP, 0);
+}
+
 static int btf_field_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
 {
 	const struct btf_field *f1 = a, *f2 = b;
-- 
2.43.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.