Re: [PATCH RFC 3/8] clk: sunxi-ng: a733: Add PRCM CCU
Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Organization | Arm Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 12:59:44 -0400 Enzo Adriano <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Enzo, > Register check for the PRCM driver against the public A733 User Manual > V0.92, chapter 4.2.5: all 41 entries I could extract (13 reset-map > entries, 18 bus gates, 10 mod/mux clocks) match the manual's register > offsets and bit positions. No discrepancies found in this patch. > > For what it's worth, we have also exercised the R-domain at runtime on a > Radxa Cubie A7S (r-ahb/r-apb0 rates with live consumers on r-pinctrl, > r-rtc and the PPU, bus-r-cpucfg via its critical flag), with no > misbehavior attributable to the PRCM model. many thanks for doing this, but please add proper tags to your replies, otherwise this won't be carried over to new revision, and your work gets lost in the cracks - as it happened this time. So you now would need to redo the review on v2. I'd suggest to compare the patches between their RFC and v2 version, and if you agree that the changes don't touch anything you checked (register offsets, bit positions), then you can just (re-)post your review with the proper tags - and a brief list of what you checked, as you did in the RFC reply. Thanks, Andre