Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] pwm: sun8i: Add H616 PWM support
James Hilliard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pwm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADvTj4ovVmY-TN7u_yj6me88qNEzr_0xbuC9DerPguFGdgOEBA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 3:26 PM Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 08:12:43AM -0600, James Hilliard wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 5:00 AM Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I didn't look at Sashiko's feedback > > > (https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]) > > > but I would expect that not all 9 high-severity issues identified are > > > slop. Please look through these for the next revision. > > > > I sent a v8 that should have fixed all the sashiko issues along with a > > bunch of other issues: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/ > > Damn, I missed that because my usual check for newer revisions is using > the sender as key (because subjects occasionally change). You didn't > write about your patch series being coordinated with Richard, I hope it > is. Richard was working on this for the same project/board. > Just looking at your changelog I think most of my manual feedback still > needs addressing. Can you (or Richard?) please go through my feedback > and address the things still relevant for your v8 please? From what I could tell most of the v7 review is either already fixed or inapplicable to the v8. Probably it needs to be reviewed separately.