Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] rust: sync: atomic: Add the framework of arithmetic operations
Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Aug 2025 09:10:21 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lkmm,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:04:12AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote: > On Sat Jul 19, 2025 at 5:08 AM CEST, Boqun Feng wrote: > > One important set of atomic operations is the arithmetic operations, > > i.e. add(), sub(), fetch_add(), add_return(), etc. However it may not > > make senses for all the types that `AtomicType` to have arithmetic > > operations, for example a `Foo(u32)` may not have a reasonable add() or > > sub(), plus subword types (`u8` and `u16`) currently don't have > > atomic arithmetic operations even on C side and might not have them in > > the future in Rust (because they are usually suboptimal on a few > > architecures). Therefore the plan is to add a few subtraits of > > `AtomicType` describing which types have and can do atomic arithemtic > > operations. > > > > One trait `AtomicAdd` is added, and only add() and fetch_add() are > > added. The rest will be added in the future. > > > > Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]> > Thank you! > > --- > > rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > rust/kernel/sync/atomic/predefine.rs | 14 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs > > index 793134aeaac1..e3a30b6aaee4 100644 > > --- a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs > > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs > > @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ > > //! > > //! [`LKMM`]: srctree/tools/memory-model/ > > > > -#[allow(dead_code, unreachable_pub)] > > mod internal; > > pub mod ordering; > > mod predefine; > > @@ -25,7 +24,7 @@ > > pub use ordering::{Acquire, Full, Relaxed, Release}; > > > > use crate::build_error; > > -use internal::{AtomicBasicOps, AtomicExchangeOps, AtomicRepr}; > > +use internal::{AtomicArithmeticOps, AtomicBasicOps, AtomicExchangeOps, AtomicRepr}; > > use ordering::OrderingType; > > > > /// A memory location which can be safely modified from multiple execution contexts. > > @@ -115,6 +114,18 @@ pub unsafe trait AtomicType: Sized + Send + Copy { > > type Repr: AtomicImpl; > > } > > > > +/// Types that support atomic add operations. > > +/// > > +/// # Safety > > +/// > > +/// `wrapping_add` any value of type `Self::Repr::Delta` obtained by [`Self::rhs_into_delta()`] to > > Can you add a normal comment TODO here: > > // TODO: properly define `wrapping_add` in this context. Yeah, this sounds good to me. How do you propose we arrange the normal comment with the doc comment, somthing like: // TODO: properly define `wrapping_add` in this context. /// Types that support atomic add operations. /// /// # Safety /// /// `wrapping_add` any value of type `Self::Repr::Delta` obtained by [`Self::rhs_into_delta()`] to ... pub unsafe trait AtomicAdd<...> { ... } Regards, Boqun > > --- > Cheers, > Benno > > > +/// any value of type `Self::Repr` obtained through transmuting a value of type `Self` to must > > +/// yield a value with a bit pattern also valid for `Self`. > > +pub unsafe trait AtomicAdd<Rhs = Self>: AtomicType { > > + /// Converts `Rhs` into the `Delta` type of the atomic implementation. > > + fn rhs_into_delta(rhs: Rhs) -> <Self::Repr as AtomicImpl>::Delta; > > +} > > + >