[RFC PATCH v4 2/4] Documentation: RCU: Refer to ptr_eq()

Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Dec 2025 20:45:29 -0500
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.lkmm,dev.linux.lists.llvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.rcu,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Refer to ptr_eq() in the rcu_dereference() documentation.

ptr_eq() is a mechanism that preserves address dependencies when
comparing pointers, and should be favored when comparing a pointer
obtained from rcu_dereference() against another pointer.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: Zqiang <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]>
Cc: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonas Oberhauser <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Nikita Popov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
Changes since v1:
- Include feedback from Paul E. McKenney.

Changes since v0:
- Include feedback from Alan Stern.
---
 Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
index 2524dcdadde2..de6175bf430f 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
@@ -104,11 +104,12 @@ readers working properly:
 	after such branches, but can speculate loads, which can again
 	result in misordering bugs.
 
--	Be very careful about comparing pointers obtained from
-	rcu_dereference() against non-NULL values.  As Linus Torvalds
-	explained, if the two pointers are equal, the compiler could
-	substitute the pointer you are comparing against for the pointer
-	obtained from rcu_dereference().  For example::
+-	Use operations that preserve address dependencies (such as
+	"ptr_eq()") to compare pointers obtained from rcu_dereference()
+	against non-NULL pointers. As Linus Torvalds explained, if the
+	two pointers are equal, the compiler could substitute the
+	pointer you are comparing against for the pointer obtained from
+	rcu_dereference().  For example::
 
 		p = rcu_dereference(gp);
 		if (p == &default_struct)
@@ -125,6 +126,29 @@ readers working properly:
 	On ARM and Power hardware, the load from "default_struct.a"
 	can now be speculated, such that it might happen before the
 	rcu_dereference().  This could result in bugs due to misordering.
+	Performing the comparison with "ptr_eq()" ensures the compiler
+	does not perform such transformation.
+
+	If the comparison is against another pointer, the compiler is
+	allowed to use either pointer for the following accesses, which
+	loses the address dependency and allows weakly-ordered
+	architectures such as ARM and PowerPC to speculate the
+	address-dependent load before rcu_dereference().  For example::
+
+		p1 = READ_ONCE(gp);
+		p2 = rcu_dereference(gp);
+		if (p1 == p2)  /* BUGGY!!! */
+			do_default(p2->a);
+
+	The compiler can use p1->a rather than p2->a, destroying the
+	address dependency.  Performing the comparison with "ptr_eq()"
+	ensures the compiler preserves the address dependencies.
+	Corrected code::
+
+		p1 = READ_ONCE(gp);
+		p2 = rcu_dereference(gp);
+		if (ptr_eq(p1, p2))
+			do_default(p2->a);
 
 	However, comparisons are OK in the following cases:
 
@@ -204,6 +228,10 @@ readers working properly:
 		comparison will provide exactly the information that the
 		compiler needs to deduce the value of the pointer.
 
+	When in doubt, use operations that preserve address dependencies
+	(such as "ptr_eq()") to compare pointers obtained from
+	rcu_dereference() against non-NULL pointers.
+
 -	Disable any value-speculation optimizations that your compiler
 	might provide, especially if you are making use of feedback-based
 	optimizations that take data collected from prior runs.  Such
-- 
2.39.5