Re: [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags
"Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lkmm,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <42d5f3b4-de3e-4110-8273-01b25b92a7c8@paulmck-laptop> |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:28:08PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:14:03 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > From: Jonas Oberhauser <[email protected]> > > > > Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic tags > > would imply. For example, an 'acquire tag on a write does not imply that > > the write is finally in the Acquire set and provides acquire ordering. > > > > To distinguish in those cases between the syntactic tags and actual > > sets, we capitalize the former, so 'ACQUIRE tags may be present on both > > reads and writes, but only reads will appear in the Acquire set. > > > > For tags where the two concepts are the same we do not use specific > > capitalization to make this distinction. > > > > Reported-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]> # herdtools7.7.58 I applied your tag to this commit and the previous one, and also your suggested Co-developed-by tags, thank you very much! Thanx, Paul > > --- > > .../Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 44 ++-- > > tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 22 +- > > tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 198 +++++++++--------- > > 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-) >