Re: Potential translation of LKMM docs into ReST
Alan Stern <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lkmm,dev.linux.lists.linux-kernel-mentees |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 01:07:23PM +0200, Ignacio Encinas Rubio wrote: > Hello! > > There is interest [1] to get the memory model documentation into the > built docs. Akira pointed out that this was discussed in the past [2]. > > A couple of years have gone by, so I was wondering whether the decision > to keep plain text documentation still applies. > > There is an "easy" way [3] to get the plain text documentation into the > built docs, but I would be happy to work in a conversion into ReST if > that's what you want :) > > Ccing people involved in [2] > > Thanks! > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ I have no great interest in seeing the memory model documentation translated into ReST, but you're welcome to try it and see how it comes out if you want. Some of the files are likely to be easier to convert than others. The only restriction I will insist on is that if the resulting ReST source files end up being unreadable because of all the markup they contain then we must keep the original plain text files too. Alan