Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for netlink_yml_parser.py

Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.lkmm,dev.linux.lists.linux-kernel-mentees,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:32:35 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > @@ -27314,6 +27315,7 @@ M:      Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> > >  F:     Documentation/netlink/
> > >  F:     Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/intro-specs.rst
> > >  F:     Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/specs.rst
> > > +F:     scripts/lib/netlink_yml_parser.py
> > >  F:     tools/net/ynl/  
> 
> With regards to the location itself, as I said earlier, it is up to
> Jon and you to decide.
> 
> My preference is to have all Python libraries at the entire Kernel
> inside scripts/lib (or at some other common location), no matter where
> the caller Python command or in-kernel Sphinx extensions are located.

I understand that from the PoV of ease of maintenance of the docs.
Is it fair to say there is a trade off here between ease of maintenance
for docs maintainers and encouraging people to integrate with kernel
docs in novel ways?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.