Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for netlink_yml_parser.py
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lkmm,dev.linux.lists.linux-kernel-mentees,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:32:35 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > @@ -27314,6 +27315,7 @@ M: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > > > F: Documentation/netlink/ > > > F: Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/intro-specs.rst > > > F: Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/specs.rst > > > +F: scripts/lib/netlink_yml_parser.py > > > F: tools/net/ynl/ > > With regards to the location itself, as I said earlier, it is up to > Jon and you to decide. > > My preference is to have all Python libraries at the entire Kernel > inside scripts/lib (or at some other common location), no matter where > the caller Python command or in-kernel Sphinx extensions are located. I understand that from the PoV of ease of maintenance of the docs. Is it fair to say there is a trade off here between ease of maintenance for docs maintainers and encouraging people to integrate with kernel docs in novel ways?