Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for netlink_yml_parser.py

Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.lkmm,dev.linux.lists.linux-kernel-mentees,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Em Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:06:58 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> escreveu:

> Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 20:56:09 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:  
> 
> >> I'm more interested on having a single place where python libraries
> >> could be placed.  
> >
> > Me too, especially for selftests. But it's not clear to me that
> > scripts/ is the right location. I thought purely user space code
> > should live in tools/ and bulk of YNL is for user space.  
> 
> I've been out wandering the woods and canyons with no connectivity for a
> bit, so missed this whole discussion, sorry.

Sounds fun!

> Mauro and I had talked about the proper home for Python libraries when
> he reworked kernel-doc; we ended up with them under scripts/, which I
> didn't find entirely pleasing.  If you were to ask me today, I'd say
> they should be under lib/python, but tomorrow I might say something
> else...

Yeah, I guess you proposed lib/python before... I could be wrong though.
Anyway, at least for me lib/python sounds a better alternative than
scripts. I won't mind tools/lib/python or some other place.

> In truth, I don't think it matters much, but I *do* think we should have
> a single location from which to import kernel-specific Python code.
> Spreading it throughout the tree just isn't going to lead to joy.

We're aligned with that regards: IMO, we need a single store within
the Kernel for classes that might be shared.

As I commented on one of PRs, maybe the series could be merged
with Donald proposed (tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/doc_generator.py),
while we're still discussing. So, let's focus on get it reviewed
and merged without needing to wait for a broader discussion
about its permanent location.

We can later shift the code once we reach an agreement.

-

To start the discussions about a permanent location, in the specific 
case of YNL, we currently have there:

	$ tree -d tools/net/ynl/ -I __pycache__
	tools/net/ynl/
	├── generated
	├── lib
	├── pyynl
	│   └── lib
	└── samples

where pyynl have executables and pyynl the python libraries.

what I would suggest is to move what it is under "pyynl/lib"
to "{prefix}/ynl", where "{prefix}" can be "lib/python",
"tools/lib/python", "scripts/lib" or whatever other location
we reach an agreement.

For now, I placed the latest version of my doc patch series
under:

	https://github.com/mchehab/linux/tree/netlink_v8

to have a central place to have them on one of my scratch
trees.

I sent today for review to linux-doc ML an initial patch series
with some non-YAML related patches. I have another set of
patches after it, which I'm planning to send on Monday. At the
end, there are the YAML parser submission.

Regards,
Mauro
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.