Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add atomic {cmp,}xchg operations
Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lkmm,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Boqun Feng" <[email protected]> writes: > xchg() and cmpxchg() are basic operations on atomic. Provide these based > on C APIs. > > Note that cmpxchg() use the similar function signature as > compare_exchange() in Rust std: returning a `Result`, `Ok(old)` means > the operation succeeds and `Err(old)` means the operation fails. > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> > --- > rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 154 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs > index 73c26f9cf6b8..bcdbeea45dd8 100644 > --- a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs > @@ -256,3 +256,157 @@ pub fn store<Ordering: ReleaseOrRelaxed>(&self, v: T, _: Ordering) { > }; > } > } > + > +impl<T: AllowAtomic> Atomic<T> > +where > + T::Repr: AtomicHasXchgOps, > +{ > + /// Atomic exchange. > + /// > + /// # Examples > + /// > + /// ```rust > + /// use kernel::sync::atomic::{Atomic, Acquire, Relaxed}; > + /// > + /// let x = Atomic::new(42); > + /// > + /// assert_eq!(42, x.xchg(52, Acquire)); > + /// assert_eq!(52, x.load(Relaxed)); > + /// ``` > + #[doc(alias("atomic_xchg", "atomic64_xchg"))] > + #[inline(always)] > + pub fn xchg<Ordering: All>(&self, v: T, _: Ordering) -> T { > + let v = T::into_repr(v); > + let a = self.as_ptr().cast::<T::Repr>(); > + > + // SAFETY: > + // - For calling the atomic_xchg*() function: > + // - `self.as_ptr()` is a valid pointer, and per the safety requirement of `AllocAtomic`, Typo: `AllowAtomic`. > + // a `*mut T` is a valid `*mut T::Repr`. Therefore `a` is a valid pointer, > + // - per the type invariants, the following atomic operation won't cause data races. > + // - For extra safety requirement of usage on pointers returned by `self.as_ptr(): > + // - atomic operations are used here. > + let ret = unsafe { > + match Ordering::TYPE { > + OrderingType::Full => T::Repr::atomic_xchg(a, v), > + OrderingType::Acquire => T::Repr::atomic_xchg_acquire(a, v), > + OrderingType::Release => T::Repr::atomic_xchg_release(a, v), > + OrderingType::Relaxed => T::Repr::atomic_xchg_relaxed(a, v), > + } > + }; > + > + T::from_repr(ret) > + } > + > + /// Atomic compare and exchange. > + /// > + /// Compare: The comparison is done via the byte level comparison between the atomic variables > + /// with the `old` value. > + /// > + /// Ordering: When succeeds, provides the corresponding ordering as the `Ordering` type > + /// parameter indicates, and a failed one doesn't provide any ordering, the read part of a > + /// failed cmpxchg should be treated as a relaxed read. Rust `core::ptr` functions have this sentence on success ordering for compare_exchange: Using Acquire as success ordering makes the store part of this operation Relaxed, and using Release makes the successful load Relaxed. Does this translate to LKMM cmpxchg operations? If so, I think we should include this sentence. This also applies to `Atomic::xchg`. Best regards, Andreas Hindborg