Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] rust: sync: atomic: Add ordering annotation types

On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 5:57 PM CEST, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 05:05:25PM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> If it were something private, then sure use `Any`, but since this is
>> public, I don't think `Any` is a good name.
>> 
>
> This essentially means we keyword `Any` as a public trait name, then we
> should document it somewhere, along with other names we want to keyword.

Then let's restrict `Any`.

---
Cheers,
Benno