Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/17] bpf: Gate verifier diagnostics on log level

kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.llvm,dev.linux.lists.oe-kbuild-all,org.kernel.vger.bpf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Kumar,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 9a3a07d06e7d74f4aecc51396c771149336ac55d]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kumar-Kartikeya-Dwivedi/bpf-Add-verifier-diagnostics-report-helpers/20260713-235352
base:   9a3a07d06e7d74f4aecc51396c771149336ac55d
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260713153910.2556007-18-memxor%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/17] bpf: Gate verifier diagnostics on log level
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260714/[email protected]/config)
compiler: clang version 22.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ca7933e47d3a3451d81e72ac174dcb5aa28b59d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260714/[email protected]/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c:38:40: warning: diagnostic behavior may be improved by adding the 'format(printf, 2, 3)' attribute to the declaration of 'diag_log' [-Wmissing-format-attribute]
      30 | static void diag_log(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *fmt, ...)
         | __attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3))) 
      31 | {
      32 |         va_list args;
      33 | 
      34 |         if (!bpf_diag_enabled(env))
      35 |                 return;
      36 | 
      37 |         va_start(args, fmt);
      38 |         bpf_verifier_vlog(&env->log, fmt, args);
         |                                               ^
   kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c:30:13: note: 'diag_log' declared here
      30 | static void diag_log(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *fmt, ...)
         |             ^
>> kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c:89:48: warning: diagnostic behavior may be improved by adding the 'format(printf, 2, 0)' attribute to the declaration of 'diag_vprint_indented' [-Wmissing-format-attribute]
      82 | static void diag_vprint_indented(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *fmt, va_list args)
         | __attribute__((format(printf, 2, 0))) 
      83 | {
      84 |         char *buf;
      85 | 
      86 |         if (!bpf_diag_enabled(env))
      87 |                 return;
      88 | 
      89 |         buf = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, fmt, args);
         |                                                       ^
   kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c:82:13: note: 'diag_vprint_indented' declared here
      82 | static void diag_vprint_indented(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *fmt, va_list args)
         |             ^
   kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c:130:13: warning: unused function 'diag_report_reason' [-Wunused-function]
     130 | static void diag_report_reason(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *fmt, ...)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c:144:13: warning: unused function 'diag_report_suggestion' [-Wunused-function]
     144 | static void diag_report_suggestion(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *fmt, ...)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   4 warnings generated.


vim +89 kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c

    81	
    82	static void diag_vprint_indented(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *fmt, va_list args)
    83	{
    84		char *buf;
    85	
    86		if (!bpf_diag_enabled(env))
    87			return;
    88	
  > 89		buf = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, fmt, args);
    90		if (!buf) {
    91			diag_log(env, "%s<failed to allocate diagnostic text>\n", BPF_DIAG_TEXT_INDENT);
    92			return;
    93		}
    94	
    95		diag_print_wrapped_text(env, buf);
    96		kfree(buf);
    97	}
    98	

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.