Re: [PATCHv2] PCI: xilinx: use fwnode_irq_get() for INTx IRQ lookup
Rosen Penev <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:54:29 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.llvm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKxU2N-2Vj1pugC_L=jhMS06CA34_-a-txZCrAoUtrRwFQ1Stg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 8:48=E2=80=AFPM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.= org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:18:15AM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 9:00=E2=80=AFAM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@ker= nel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 01:58:11PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > > > Replace irq_of_parse_and_map() with fwnode_irq_get(dev_fwnode(dev),= 0) > > > > in xilinx_pcie_parse_dt(). For an OF-backed device this is equivale= nt to > > > > the previous call, but uses the generic firmware-node API. > > > > > > > > > > What is the benefit of using fwnode API for OF only driver? > > I get conflicting information. Apparently of_irq_get needs a call to > > irq_dispose_mapping but fwnode_irq_get does not. > > That's not true. fwnode_irq_get() becomes a wrapper to of_irq_get() if OF= is > used. So both needs a call to irq_dispose_mapping() in the error path. I don't see irq_dispose_mapping() for fwnode_irq_get() in the codebase. > > - Mani > > -- > =E0=AE=AE=E0=AE=A3=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=B5=E0=AE=A3=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=A3=E0=AE=A9= =E0=AF=8D =E0=AE=9A=E0=AE=A4=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=9A=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=B5=E0=AE=AE= =E0=AF=8D