Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm: backtrace-clang: fix wrong sp usage for unwinding
Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 11:22:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.llvm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260803182255.GC1067866@ax162> |
Hi Maninder, On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 09:11:01AM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote: > Ping! Any comments? I am not that familiar with this code but maybe Nick (whose address I have now updated to point to a better one) or Ard could help take a look? Original patch is at https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]/ but I have left it inline as well. > > show_stack() can be called for any task, however c_backtrace always unwinds > > frames based on the "sp" register. This results in printing the backtrace of > > the current task instead of the target task. > > > > Try with normal TC: > > ================== > > for_each_process(p) { > > sched_show_task(p); > > } > > > > [7.433271] task:kthreadd state:S stack:0 pid:2 tgid:2 ppid:0 task_flags:0x208040 flags:0x00000000 > > [7.433633] Call trace: > > [7.433640] [<80113418>] (dump_backtrace) from [<80113510>] (show_stack+0x14/0x18) > > .. > > [7.433676] [<8016749c>] (sched_show_task) from [<803cb324>] (meminfo_proc_show+0x6c/0x930) > > [7.434019] r5:8158e300 r4:8b4882d0 > > [7.434024] [<803cb324>] (meminfo_proc_show) from [<80365788>] (seq_read_iter+0x148/0x4bc) > > [7.434045] [<80365788>] (seq_read_iter) from [<803c044c>] (proc_reg_read_iter+0xb8/0xc4) > > [7.434060] [<803c044c>] (proc_reg_read_iter) from [<80377104>] (copy_splice_read+0x228/0x308) > > > > It should unwind frame based on passed "fp". > > (CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER=y) > > > > With fix: > > ========= > > [13.933732] task:kthreadd state:S stack:0 pid:2 tgid:2 ppid:0 task_flags:0x208040 flags:0x00000000 > > [13.934165] Call trace: > > [13.934604] [<80afa1a8>] (schedule) from [<8015426c>] (kthreadd+0x124/0x208) > > [13.934654] r10:8100bbf0 r4:8116f440 > > [13.934664] [<8015426c>] (kthreadd) from [<8010010c>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28) > > [13.934691] Exception stack(0xf081df9c to 0xf081dfe4) > > > > Additionally, the extra manipulation of "sp" register appears unnecessary in the "current" > > task also since the "fp" register is already provided. > > > > Signed-off-by: Onkarnath > > Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh > > --- > > arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S | 4 ---- > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S > > index 290c52a60fc6..993410a6afd1 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S > > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S > > @@ -105,10 +105,6 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace) > > moveq mask, #0xfc000003 > > movne mask, #0 @ mask for 32-bit > > > > -/* > > - * Switches the current frame to be the frame for dump_stack. > > - */ > > - add frame, sp, #24 @ switch to false frame > > for_each_frame: tst frame, mask @ Check for address exceptions > > bne no_frame > > > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > -- Cheers, Nathan