Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Reload one-shot TVAL on migration destination
Bibo Mao <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:21:57 +0800
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026/7/15 下午1:53, Tao Cui wrote: > > > 在 2026/7/15 11:49, Bibo Mao 写道: >> >> >> On 2026/7/15 上午11:28, Tao Cui wrote: >>> From: Tao Cui <[email protected]> >>> >>> kvm_restore_timer() rebuilds the remaining timer countdown from >>> vcpu->arch.expire, which is host-internal and is not part of the migrated >>> vCPU state. On the migration destination it is still 0, so for a one-shot >>> timer that has not expired yet the computed delta is 0 and >>> write_gcsr_timertick(0) injects the timer interrupt immediately instead of >>> after the remaining time. The guest observes a premature timer event right >>> after migration. >>> >>> The expired one-shot case (TVAL = -1) is already handled earlier, so only >>> the non-expired one-shot path is affected. When expire has not been set >>> (i.e. on the destination), reload the remaining countdown from the >>> migrated TVAL. The regular preempt/resume path on the source, where >>> expire is valid, is unchanged. >>> >>> Fixes: a5857b9ff6e0 ("LoongArch: KVM: Implement vcpu timer operations") >>> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> arch/loongarch/kvm/timer.c | 8 ++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/timer.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/timer.c >>> index 3829f35a4070..57f53d19a00a 100644 >>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/timer.c >>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/timer.c >>> @@ -132,6 +132,14 @@ void kvm_restore_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> * during injecting intr async >>> */ >>> kvm_queue_irq(vcpu, INT_TI); >>> + } else if (!expire) { >>> + /* >>> + * One-shot timer on the migration destination: vcpu->arch.expire >>> + * is host-internal and is not migrated, so it is still 0 here. >> Good catch, I ever noticed this issue before however without good method. My previous method is to recalculate vcpu->arch.expire in function _kvm_setcsr() when LOONGARCH_CSR_TVAL is set and value of vcpu->arch.expire is 0. >> > Thanks for the review and for sharing your idea. I also considered > recalculating expire in _kvm_setcsr() when TVAL is restored, but ended > up keeping the change within kvm_restore_timer() to avoid touching the > core CSR write path. Both approaches are functionally equivalent since > the first save_timer() after restore will set expire correctly either > way. > > That said, if you prefer the _kvm_setcsr() approach, I'm happy to The problem in _kvm_setcsr() is that there is only register LOONGARCH_CSR_TVAL however no context of LOONGARCH_CSR_TCFG register, it seems that it is better in to restore it in kvm_restore_timer() function where all registers about CPU timer are set. How about something like this, it should work with period timer mode when migration. @@ -119,6 +119,17 @@ void kvm_restore_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) delta = 0; now = ktime_get(); expire = vcpu->arch.expire; + if (!expire) { + /* + * The field vcpu->arch.expire is host-internal and is not + * migrated, so it is 0 after migration. Reload the + * remaining countdown from the migrated TVAL. + */ + if (ticks < cfg) + delta = tick_to_ns(vcpu, ticks); + expire = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), delta); + } + > rework the patch accordingly. ok, that is fine. Thanks for catching this issue. Regards Bibo Mao > > Thanks, > Tao >> Regards >> Bibo Mao >>> + * Reload the remaining countdown from the migrated TVAL instead >>> + * of firing the timer immediately. >>> + */ >>> + delta = ticks; >>> } >>> write_gcsr_timertick(delta); >>> >>