Re: [PATCH RFC 00/18] arch, mm: create a generic set_memory/change_page_attr core
Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:28:56 +0300
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 10:19:43AM -0700, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 07:23:23PM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote: > > Currently there are 6 independent implementations for set_memory and > > set_direct_map APIs. > > So with all mm/x86/CPA patches flying around, can we first agree on which tree > is going to collect everything? I hope all the fixes flying around will be merged before I even get to v1 :) In any case, I'm going to wait for the fixes to settle before posting this not as RFC. Obviously, the code movement will include all the merged fixes then. > And if I want to review patches in that area, what am I applying it ontop? > linux-next perhaps... This set is on top of v7.2-rc1. It includes a patch Dave took to tip and one fix from those flying around. > Let's sort out the workflow first so that we don't get lost on fruitless bug > chases and fingerpointing. I'll take it via the memblock tree? ;-) > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette -- Sincerely yours, Mike.