Re: [PATCH RFC 00/18] arch, mm: create a generic set_memory/change_page_attr core

On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 10:03:03AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/21/26 10:19, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 07:23:23PM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote:
> >> Currently there are 6 independent implementations for set_memory and
> >> set_direct_map APIs.
> > So with all mm/x86/CPA patches flying around, can we first agree on which tree
> > is going to collect everything?
> > 
> > And if I want to review patches in that area, what am I applying it ontop?
> > linux-next perhaps...
> > 
> > Let's sort out the workflow first so that we don't get lost on fruitless bug
> > chases and fingerpointing.
> 
> Just practically, I think this series needs to be ignored for a bit. Bug
> fixes first, features and cleanups second.

Ignored is a bit strong, I'd still love to get feedback on the concept.
 
> When the time is right, it probably needs to get get acks from all the
> affected architectures and go through mm. Folks can ack it now, but I
> don't think anyone should even consider merging it until ~7.3-rc1.

FWIF, I didn't plan to send non-RFC version before 7.3-rc1.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.