Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mfd: loongson-se: Fix miscellaneous issues
Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAhV-H79JdBRmNpCKPEfHxMARr5zNVAnP3mJYOWo6zwBpF2q2Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 10:09 AM Qunqin Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 在 2026/8/3 16:01, Huacai Chen 写道: > > Hi, Qunqin, > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 4:41 PM Qunqin Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Address multiple historical driver issues discovered by the Sashiko > >> Automation system within the loongson_se_probe() initialization flow > >> and the driver's interrupt service routines [1]. > >> > >> - Add an explicit bounds check in se_irq_handler() before accessing > >> the engines array to prevent out-of-bounds memory writes. > >> > >> - Switch from devm_kmalloc() to devm_kzalloc() and explicitly > >> initialize all engine completion structures in probe() to avoid a > >> kernel panic from complete() dereferencing a NULL wait head when a > >> spurious interrupt fires before child drivers call > >> loongson_se_init_engine(). > >> > >> - Replace engine_init_lock with a broader cmd_lock mutex that > >> serializes all command submissions, and move the lock into > >> loongson_se_send_controller_cmd() and > >> loongson_se_send_engine_cmd() to cover the full register write + > >> poll + wait sequence. > >> > >> - Drop the spin_lock_irq from loongson_se_poll() so that interrupts > >> are not disabled for up to 10 ms during the poll. Keep the > >> readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic() busy-wait to avoid scheduling > >> latency for fast hardware completions. > >> > >> - Add reinit_completion() to loongson_se_send_controller_cmd() and > >> loongson_se_send_engine_cmd() before waiting to prevent stale > >> completions from falsely returning success after a signal > >> interruption. > >> > >> - Fix EPROBE_DEFER handling: propagate the error directly from > >> platform_irq_count() instead of overwriting it with ENODEV so that > >> probe deferral works when the interrupt provider is not yet ready. > >> > >> - Validate dmam_size from firmware against the minimum required size > >> to prevent command buffers from pointing outside the allocated > >> DMA region. > >> > >> - Return the error code from devm_request_irq() instead of silently > >> continuing to prevent an indefinite hang. > >> > >> - Disable hardware interrupts in the probe error path when > >> loongson_se_init() fails to prevent an unhandled interrupt storm. > >> > >> - Add a loongson_se_stop() cleanup handler registered with > >> devm_add_action_or_reset() to send SE_CMD_STOP to the controller > >> and mask all interrupts during device removal. Using devres > >> ensures that child MFD devices are unbound before the controller > >> is stopped. The STOP command uses a non-interruptible wait to > >> avoid leaving hardware running while DMA buffers are freed. > >> > >> - Zero-initialize the local controller command structure in > >> loongson_se_init() to prevent uninitialized stack memory from > >> being written to device registers. > >> > >> - Add the SE_CMD_STOP command definition. > >> > >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1] > >> Fixes: e551fa3159e3 ("mfd: Add support for Loongson Security Engine chip controller") > >> Signed-off-by: Qunqin Zhao <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/loongson-se.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > >> include/linux/mfd/loongson-se.h | 1 + > >> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/loongson-se.c b/drivers/mfd/loongson-se.c > >> index 7f552a8ee6..2c8afad1b0 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/mfd/loongson-se.c > >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/loongson-se.c > >> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct loongson_se { > >> void *dmam_base; > >> int dmam_size; > >> > >> - struct mutex engine_init_lock; > >> + struct mutex cmd_lock; > >> struct loongson_se_engine engines[SE_ENGINE_MAX]; > >> }; > >> > >> @@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ static int loongson_se_poll(struct loongson_se *se, u32 int_bit) > >> u32 status; > >> int err; > >> > >> - spin_lock_irq(&se->dev_lock); > > You said you don't want to disable irq here, but I think the spinlock > > is still needed. That means you should use spin_lock/spin_unlock to > > replace spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq. > Since loongson_se_poll always executes in the thread context, is it > better to use mutex_lock( > mutex_lock(&se->cmd_lock) outside of loongson_se_poll) for > synchronization? If all callers have used mutex_lock(&se->cmd_lock), then spinlock is unnecessary. > > > >> - > >> /* Notify the controller that the engine needs to be started */ > >> writel(int_bit, se->base + SE_L2SINT_SET); > >> > >> @@ -52,8 +50,6 @@ static int loongson_se_poll(struct loongson_se *se, u32 int_bit) > >> !(status & int_bit), > >> 1, LOONGSON_ENGINE_CMD_TIMEOUT_US); > >> > >> - spin_unlock_irq(&se->dev_lock); > >> - > >> return err; > >> } > >> > >> @@ -63,24 +59,40 @@ static int loongson_se_send_controller_cmd(struct loongson_se *se, > >> u32 *send_cmd = (u32 *)cmd; > >> int err, i; > >> > >> + mutex_lock(&se->cmd_lock); > >> + > >> + reinit_completion(&se->cmd_completion); > >> + > >> for (i = 0; i < SE_SEND_CMD_REG_LEN; i++) > >> writel(send_cmd[i], se->base + SE_SEND_CMD_REG + i * 4); > >> > >> err = loongson_se_poll(se, SE_INT_CONTROLLER); > >> if (err) > >> - return err; > >> + goto out; > >> + > >> + err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&se->cmd_completion); > >> > >> - return wait_for_completion_interruptible(&se->cmd_completion); > >> +out: > >> + mutex_unlock(&se->cmd_lock); > >> + return err; > >> } > >> > >> int loongson_se_send_engine_cmd(struct loongson_se_engine *engine) > >> { > >> + int err; > >> + > >> + mutex_lock(&engine->se->cmd_lock); > >> + > >> + reinit_completion(&engine->completion); > >> + > >> /* > >> * After engine initialization, the controller already knows > >> * where to obtain engine commands from. Now all we need to > >> * do is notify the controller that the engine needs to be started. > >> */ > >> - int err = loongson_se_poll(engine->se, BIT(engine->id)); > >> + err = loongson_se_poll(engine->se, BIT(engine->id)); > >> + > >> + mutex_unlock(&engine->se->cmd_lock); > >> > >> if (err) > >> return err; > >> @@ -97,7 +109,7 @@ struct loongson_se_engine *loongson_se_init_engine(struct device *dev, int id) > >> > >> engine->se = se; > >> engine->id = id; > >> - init_completion(&engine->completion); > >> + reinit_completion(&engine->completion); > > I'm not sure, but I think loongson_se_init_engine() is only called at > > init, so we need init_completion here. > > To prevent an spurious interrupt from completing an uninitialized object, > all objects have already been fully initialized with init_completion during the probe stage. In my opinion, if a function can be called multiple times, we need reinit_completion(), if it is only called for probe, we need init_completion(), and loongson_se_init_engine() looks like the later case. Huacai > > > > > Huacai > > > >> /* Divide DMA memory equally among all engines */ > >> engine->buffer_size = se->dmam_size / SE_ENGINE_MAX; > >> @@ -113,8 +125,6 @@ struct loongson_se_engine *loongson_se_init_engine(struct device *dev, int id) > >> engine->command = se->dmam_base + id * (2 * SE_ENGINE_CMD_SIZE); > >> engine->command_ret = engine->command + SE_ENGINE_CMD_SIZE; > >> > >> - mutex_lock(&se->engine_init_lock); > >> - > >> /* Tell the controller where to find engine command */ > >> cmd.command_id = SE_CMD_SET_ENGINE_CMDBUF; > >> cmd.info[0] = id; > >> @@ -124,8 +134,6 @@ struct loongson_se_engine *loongson_se_init_engine(struct device *dev, int id) > >> if (loongson_se_send_controller_cmd(se, &cmd)) > >> engine = NULL; > >> > >> - mutex_unlock(&se->engine_init_lock); > >> - > >> return engine; > >> } > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(loongson_se_init_engine); > >> @@ -155,7 +163,8 @@ static irqreturn_t se_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > >> /* For engines */ > >> while (int_status) { > >> id = __ffs(int_status); > >> - complete(&se->engines[id].completion); > >> + if (id < SE_ENGINE_MAX) > >> + complete(&se->engines[id].completion); > >> int_status &= ~BIT(id); > >> writel(BIT(id), se->base + SE_S2LINT_CL); > >> } > >> @@ -167,7 +176,7 @@ static irqreturn_t se_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > >> > >> static int loongson_se_init(struct loongson_se *se, dma_addr_t addr, int size) > >> { > >> - struct loongson_se_controller_cmd cmd; > >> + struct loongson_se_controller_cmd cmd = {0}; > >> int err; > >> > >> cmd.command_id = SE_CMD_START; > >> @@ -188,6 +197,30 @@ static const struct mfd_cell engines[] = { > >> { .name = "tpm_loongson" }, > >> }; > >> > >> +static void loongson_se_stop(void *data) > >> +{ > >> + struct loongson_se *se = data; > >> + struct loongson_se_controller_cmd cmd = {0}; > >> + u32 *send_cmd = (u32 *)&cmd; > >> + int i; > >> + > >> + mutex_lock(&se->cmd_lock); > >> + > >> + cmd.command_id = SE_CMD_STOP; > >> + > >> + reinit_completion(&se->cmd_completion); > >> + > >> + for (i = 0; i < SE_SEND_CMD_REG_LEN; i++) > >> + writel(send_cmd[i], se->base + SE_SEND_CMD_REG + i * 4); > >> + > >> + if (!loongson_se_poll(se, SE_INT_CONTROLLER)) > >> + wait_for_completion(&se->cmd_completion); > >> + > >> + writel(0, se->base + SE_S2LINT_EN); > >> + > >> + mutex_unlock(&se->cmd_lock); > >> +} > >> + > >> static int loongson_se_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> { > >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > >> @@ -195,19 +228,25 @@ static int loongson_se_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> int nr_irq, irq, err, i; > >> dma_addr_t paddr; > >> > >> - se = devm_kmalloc(dev, sizeof(*se), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + se = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*se), GFP_KERNEL); > >> if (!se) > >> return -ENOMEM; > >> > >> dev_set_drvdata(dev, se); > >> init_completion(&se->cmd_completion); > >> spin_lock_init(&se->dev_lock); > >> - mutex_init(&se->engine_init_lock); > >> + mutex_init(&se->cmd_lock); > >> + > >> + for (i = 0; i < SE_ENGINE_MAX; i++) > >> + init_completion(&se->engines[i].completion); > Thanks >