Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/14] bpf, loongarch: Fix stack arguments for indirect trampolines
Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.kernel.vger.bpf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026/8/28 下午12:55, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > On Fri Aug 28, 2026 at 6:33 AM CEST, Tiezhu Yang wrote: ... >> With this patch: >> >> $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops_trampoline >> #471 struct_ops_trampoline:OK >> Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED >> >> Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> > > Thanks a lot for the test. Please also take a look at the argument rebase > patches once you folks have more cycles. Will definitely need your help and > reviews since they are mostly vibe coded. Hi Kumar, I have sent a standalone prerequisite fix for the pre-existing issue: LoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error for insn_is_cast_user https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/[email protected]/ IMO, when you respin, please rebase your patches 07, 08, and 09 on top of this fix for your v2 series. Additionally, please send the v2 as a standalone series to the loongarch mailing list [email protected] and the reviewer Hengqi Chen <[email protected]> too, as the LoongArch BPF JIT patches are typically routed through the loongarch-next tree. https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/CAAhV-H55YcyXRewC+0YzTHXb1jab0GkAV13EF9nFbTx=UkX4ww@mail.gmail.com/ Thanks, Tiezhu