[PATCH] (DRAFT!) Fix a deadlock in CLVMD (possibly related to BZ 561226).
Petr Rockai <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lvm-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected].> |
Petr Rockai <[email protected]> writes: > (It is also recommended that the reviewer spends a while reading > pthread_cond_wait manpage, especially the section about the mutex > pointer, and also with a paper and pencil sketching on how things > could go wrong if the mutex is used incorrectly, as in this case.) I can try to illustrate the problem in ASCII art... There is a single mutex around (L for Lock, U for Unlock), a signal (S) and a wait (W). C for pthread_create. Time flows from left to right, each arrow is a thread. So first the "naive" scenario, with no mutex (PPT = pre_and_post_thread, MCT = main clvmd thread). I will also use X, for a moment when MCT actually waits for something to happen that PPT was supposed to do. MCT -----C ------S--X-----S----X----------------------S------XXXXXXXXX | everything OK up to this --> <-- point... PPT -----WWW-----WWWW------------------------------WWWWWWWWWWWWW Ok, so pthread API actually does not let you use W/S like that. It goes out of its way to tell you that you need a mutex to protect the W so that the above cannot happen. *But* if you get creative and just lock around the W's and S's, this happens: MCT ----C-----LSU----X-----LSU----X------------LSU------XXXXXXX | PPT ---LWWWU-------LWWWWU-----------------------LWWWWWWWWW Ooops. Nothing changed (the above is what actually was done by clvmd before the patch). So let's do it differently, holding L locked *all* the time in PPT, unless we are actually in W (this is something that the pthread API does itself, see the man page). MCT ----C-----LSU------X---LSU---X-----LLLLLLLSU----X---- | (and they live happily ever after) PPT L---WWWWW---------WWWW----------------W---------- So W actually ensures that L is unlocked *atomically* together with entering the wait. That means that unless PPT is actually waiting, it cannot be signalled by MCT. So if MCT happens to signal it too soon (it wasn't waiting yet), it MCT will be blocked on the mutex (L), until PPT is actually ready to do something. That's the story. You obviously need monotype-capable reader to make any sense of it. : - ) Yours, Petr.