Re: Reg LVM PE Size and any limitations out of it
"Bryn M. Reeves" <[email protected]> Fri, 30 May 2025 15:29:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lvm-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:36:07PM +0530, Lakshmi Narasimhan Sundararajan wrote: > 2) Is there any limit to the max number of PE in a VG? > It is not called out in any man pages, but an internet search gave me > a max of 16M extents in a VG. So here I am asking for clarification, > and worried if there is such a limit, would it limit then the VG > capacity expansion to only 16M * 4M ~ 64 T [It did not though, I > experimentally validated it]. > 3) under what scenarios does one need to consider applying > physicalextentsize explicitly? > I am trying to understand the usecase this came about. I think I see where this is coming from. The top result on Google (at least for me, but I imagine from your post it's similar for others), is this 11 year old SuperUser question thread: https://superuser.com/questions/735600/size-of-extent-on-lvm2 The poster incorrectly links to an old HP manual describing the limits for the *HP-UX* Logical Volume Manager: https://docstore.mik.ua/manuals/hp-ux/en/5992-4589/apa.html Although Linux LVM1 (long since ancient history) was inspired by the HP-UX tools the tables at this URL have nothing to do with Linux LVM, especially lvm2. I agree this belongs in a man page, and shouldn't take so much searching to track down. Regards, Bryn.