Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] swsusp: make it possible to hibernate to device mapper devices
Askar Safin <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2025 02:18:37 +0300
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lvm-devel,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.linux-lvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-raid,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>: > Askar Safin requires swap and hibernation on the dm-integrity device mapper > target because he needs to protect his data. Hi, Mikulas, Milan and others. I'm running swap on dm-integrity for 40 days. It runs mostly without problems. But yesterday my screen freezed for 4 minutes. And then continued to work normally. So, may I ask again a question: is swap on dm-integrity supposed to work at all? (I. e. swap partition on top of dm-integrity partition on top of actual disk partition.) (I'm talking about swap here, not about hibernation.) Mikulas Patocka said here https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ : > Encrypted swap file is not supposed to work. It uses the loop device that > routes the requests to a filesystem and the filesystem needs to allocate > memory to process requests. > So, this is what happened to you - the machine runs out of memory, it > needs to swap out some pages, dm-crypt encrypts the pages and generates > write bios, the write bios are directed to the loop device, the loop > device directs them to the filesystem, the filesystem attempts to allocate > more memory => deadlock. Does the same apply to dm-integrity? I. e. is it possible that write to dm-integrity will lead to allocation? -- Askar Safin